Greedy Associates Boards   |  Threaded Discussion Forums   |  Newsletter
Greedy IP Board
Happy trails . . .

Home | Messages | Photos | Links | Contacts | Contact Administrators | FAQ | Newsletter |

Message 66939 of 67899 <- Previous | Next -> | View All | Reply | Post

Reason for Combining References in Reverse Patently Chicken Redux May 04, 2012 02:37 pm
The 103 rejections states that the claims are unpatentable over Reference A in view of Reference B. The Examiner had previously used Reference A in a 102 rejection. However, Reference A involves a Truck and Reference B involves a Cart. Reference B is solely used for the fact it discloses a cart. There is nothing else that the Examiner used from Reference B to reject the claims.
When stating the reason for combining A and B, the Examiner says that it would have been obvious for a POSITA to substitute the features disclosed in Reference A for the features of found in Reference B because of the alleged benefit provided by the features of Reference A.

In my experience, the Secondary Reference B is used to modify the Primary Reference A. I have never encountered a situation where the Examiner is modifing the Secondary Reference in view of the Primary Reference. Does the MPEP even make any statement allowing this? IMHO, the Examiner can only use some reason in Secondary Reference B to modify the truck of Primary Reference A to be a cart.

  Replies (view all)
message 66940 by select_arrange

Message 66939 of 67899 <- Previous | Next -> | View All | Reply | Post

   Go to: Oldest | Most Recent or msg #

Find Legal Jobs:

Message Board Terms of Use and Disclaimer
800 West California Avenue, 2nd Floor, Sunnyvale, CA 94086
Tel: (888) 257-9500;    Fax: (408) 524-4798;    Contact Us
Privacy policy  Site Contents © 1999-2006  Terms of service